"why 528?" How to determine if these tones really can heal, a gdv test would be handy
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Theres already lot of different tuning fork sets, saying these specific tones heal - but does it? Or not?? What should be guidelines to test [time exposed, volume, distance from listener, previous/posthomous state of listener, time of day, humidity etc]...has it been done, and what were results? wonder if masaru emoto [there was that live h20 event but any experiments done that day?] or others tested water with these tones, versus ones slightly different [but with similar ratios], and with other ratios, or including differences in such-tuned timbre [ambience] of an instrument playing them, and resulting differences ...
Robanan, your idea of 3 tones - would be simpler. Which would you choose? Id like to toy around w/a tonal calculator java program and hear what the tone I get for the Hz...['perfect' pitch over here
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
]. Problems I found - the freqs Ive read about; 174 <-> 963 [174, 285, 396, 417 ..], pitches are assigned [how?] to different of these [but do not represent hz yet are called hz] and above the first three, from 417 up to 963 it sounds just like the overtone series [in A flat - if you go by 417 becoming 443.0something hz, a bit sharper than 440 concert tuning for 'A'. How is 443 a-flat, then??
The delta of 111 [why this was chosen?] btw each one, does not hold as a pattern, either, without altering the 369s, unless you replace the 9s in the 369, 396...with zeros [after you get to 3xx, 6xx, or 9xx], and get #s: 360, or 306, etc...and add 111 again until getting to 6xx, 9xx, etc. There's a cascading up by 1, between each adjacent same-placed decimal per group [1 74, 2 85, 3 96, 4 17, etc], just w/o the zeros...in this pitch scheme. Theres others....I saw one that uses ... 81 tones
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
why idk really.
other problem:
http://web.mac.com/len15/LOVE528/528_Tuner.html look at the 'perfect circle of sound' 528, and 417, converted into the tuner....same hz, but different notes?? seems theres a mistake there. My concern is what concepts are these based on I have yet to figure.
Overtone [singing] would include those last 6 of the 9 tones there are reported [a flat, c, e flat, g flat, a flat and b flat], and would not be limited to this key alone [of '528' said to be the note 'C' ]. I am still unsure as to how the solfeg # groups were arrived at and more importantly, converted to the pitches just mentioned. The normal overtone scale:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_s ... 28music%29