Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Official information, announcements and interviews in the press, on TV, radio.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
teradactyl
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:43 pm
Location: canada

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12831Post teradactyl »

well, its 2012 and the wiki is still down... :scratch:
is there any other way we can put this book out there? :computer: ???
Om Mani Padme Om
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12903Post Rezo »

there is also a facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/2339719323/ [thiaoouba prophecy xp]. I, and some of others here, post there as well.

A question as far as timing of ikirito-observatory asteroid detection date; the time line of impact from bakaratinian arrival on earth, is 30,000 years later [from 1.35 million y.a.] thiaoouba prophecy, p. 87. so 1.35 mil y.a [before 1987] - 30,000 y.a. = 1,320,000 y.a.; 2000 years later, seismic shock of single continent emergence directly as result of cataclysm, into 3 principle continents [1,318,000 y.a.]; yellow race establishes colony in northwest Mu, 300,000 years ago [a whopping 1,018,000 years later!!]

thats a big amount of time, to elapse in "coming to terms" with the disaster [which must therefore have been quite dramatic]. And much later, of course, 250,000 years ago [50,000 years after the unsuccessful bakaratini-earthling migration to n.w. mu], when aremo x3 people first came to china, and were attacked. pg. 88. This obviously, highlighted my curiosity in terms of what kinds of societal and technological developments had gone on, during those long stretches of time. [The 'Chinese' had still retained some of their technology from ages past, [or, had re-developed them, again, in some similar form]. From 300,000 to 250,000 years before 1987, is a whole 50,000 years itself, where much development must have taken place, or, sufficiently enough, to cause the aremo x3 craft's pilots to decide to fend them off and retreat to the moon!

I feel [in my unprofessional opinion] the date of impacts of 800,000 y.a. meteor, previously discussed, may be inaccurately dated too young; We'd have to compare methods of each to obtain dating, and see if any increase in accuracy could be found, in order to claim a new date for them [to be done via actual research i dont have the skill funds or time to undertake]. http://users.tpg.com.au/horsts/paine_indochina.pdf ["Signs of a devastating asteroid impact in indochina 800,000 years ago" by Michael Paine].

Thao had mentioned the smallest of 3 fragments hit 'where red sea is now', was 3 km, and timor sea impact was 2nd largest, described as "much larger" - A kilometer, is about .62 mi. so, how large was it ... ? Side note, Not sure if theres any relation to donald and edward payne who are on NU journal editorial board, but its interesting article to me, anyway.

http://www.telemedical.com/Telemedical/impactevents.htm [library of impact events]
http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/4related.html#a4 [another impact library set of links]
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12907Post Rezo »

part 2:

I was going to totally get behind my theory of eltanin impact = "actual" galapagos vicinity [ s. georgia island], due to recent biodiversity discoveries on those islands. I merely state this theory for possibility rather than being sure. because impacts of galapagos seem too different in size [smaller] or too far off, dating wise [at least what ive read so far].

And yet, other measurements say, Eltanin was 132 km!!
http://astronomy.activeboard.com/forum. ... ID=5426654
https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2002AM/final ... _45134.htm

A rival study in 1994, strongly contradicts the findings of 132 km, saying its grossly inaccurate
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/largei ... f/4095.pdf

"actual" galapagos? biodiversity of s. georgia is [located in bellingshausen sea [antarctic/southern atlantic just below patagonia]:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environmen ... 89706.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingshausen_Sea

relate Eltanin now, this is where i got the idea, this to book quote of what happened in antarctica: "a huge portion of antarctica sank in the waters, creating two immense underwater canyons between antarctica and australia." the two largest impacts were said in the book to have been timor sea, and 'actual' galapagos. a new continent emerged from the "center of the south pacific ocean" granted, south is relatively large area. so, i could be very wrong about eltanin. its just simply all I could find that might match...
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12908Post Rezo »

pt 3:

briefly going back to Michael Paine's mentioned Lee and Wei in his pdf, estimated a diamter of indochina impact, as being between 60 and 116 km [!!] indeed, that is "much larger" than 3 km. And estimated 793,000 [younger] years ago impact from two deep sea cores, as measurement.

[and if 132 km is right about eltanin, it would also match up well]. despite the harvard study results. [wish i studied geology!]

red sea wise .... almost nothing I could find at all. Whats interesting is the wording - again. "Where the red sea is now" [for emphasis]. The only other impacts in the area of north africa [quick search], was a ~ 3.5 km ouarkziz crater in algeria - est. 70 mil years old ... and another in tanzania called 'ngorongoro crater', about 20 km BUT is infact a volcanic caldear. Which leads me back to ghana, @ lake bosumtwi [that would mean according to my wacky theory, that if axis tilted from larger impacts, bosumtwi was geographically, where the red sea is, now]. "another basin of land subsided and the red sea was formed" [may have more to do with 'red sea rift' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea_Rift - a major fault zone?]

http://www.univie.ac.at/geochemistry/koeberl/bosumtwi/

I admit all of this is pretty much a shot in the 'twilight' id like to say, and of course is kind of "disaster chasing" so let this be my last post for a while at least, on this topic. if we knew the angle of entry and impact velocities of all three pieces, roughly anyway, its possible one may be able to reconstruct what sort of 'spinning' on the earth went on, then whatever land was where red sea is today, would tell us maybe, where the impact of 'where the red sea is now' may be located. I say this because in other places, she said 'exactly where thailand is now', by contrast, to describe location of a strait [p.35].

So, an axis shift having taken place as result of these 3 impacts mentioned in TP : from rotation of 30 hr, 12 min, revolution of 280 days, to something else [closer to today]. unfortunately i think there may be too many unknowns to make a decent calculation. I admit my parsing of 'exactly where', or 'where x is now' is not terribly explicit and leaves much open in terms of what happened, where. hence my desire to cease this particular exploration ... [interesting to me though it may be]
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12917Post Rezo »

anyone ever see this? Dont know who made it. or, if i did, I forgot ;p

http://wikibin.org/articles/thiaoouba-prophecy.html
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12918Post Rezo »

[as related to previous entries regarding dating of historical oceanic meteor impacts]

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/pip/2011GC004029.shtml

methods of determining accuracy of optically stimulated luminescence dating of deep-sea sediments
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Wikipedia deleted Thiaoouba Prophecy article

Post: # 12992Post Rezo »

here is an article regarding the finding this past february of a deep canyon underneath the reed sea:

http://news.discovery.com/earth/oceans/ ... 130226.htm

however, ive not yet retrieved any data regarding meteoric impact of any kind recorded in this area [yet].

this, as a best alternative to the bosumtwi theory i had earlier, which timewise makes sense, but not position-wise. . it rather, may have been a fragment that broke off reed sea 'roid, before impact.[?]

if anyone finds meteoric impact data for reed sea, dont hesitate to post it [esp. if dating reasonably falls within range of 1.35 mil ya - 900 k ya].

if in fact it can be found meteoric impact sites there, it may be possible [and of course its another guess] that the bosumtwi meteor is a fragment, of this one...? :study:
Post Reply