Pyramid found under the water in the Azores

A place to discuss matters of bygone times that are forgotten, but are recovered so that humanity is no longer condemned to repeat history as it so often does.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Lachie
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Pyramid found under the water in the Azores

Post: # 12996Post Lachie »

http://portuguese-american-journal.com/ ... nd-azores/

Very similar to structures above-ground. Oriented north-south to catch the aether flows and concentrate them!

Lachie
God is a games designer =]
Krad
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:29 am

Re: Pyramid found under the water in the Azores

Post: # 13003Post Krad »

From what I understand about the pyramids (the functioning ones), they have nothing to do with "aether flow".(whatever that means). At least according to TP.
User avatar
Robanan
Posts: 949
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 3:27 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Pyramid found under the water in the Azores

Post: # 13006Post Robanan »

There is a video lecture of Michel on youtube, and he talks about pyramids under the water, even mentioning they don't have anything to do with the disappearance anomalies, I don't know, were these pyramids found then? or he knew about them before they are found?
The essence of Consciousness, is the ability to Create, Process, Transmit and Receive Information Autonomously.
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Pyramid found under the water in the Azores

Post: # 13125Post Rezo »

bathymetric analysis of Portuguese Diocleciano Silva, of pyramid object, is between açores islands, sao miguel and terceira; its thought to be "approximately 60 metres tall with a base of around 8,000 square metres." imo this is not large enough to either be the 'atlantis' pyramid, or, its just partly showing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathymetry mid-atlantic ridge is deep; up to 2,000 m [6,561.6798 feet]. As per TP, page 91 , the savanasa pyramid was said to be *exactly* 440.01 m in height, with Great pyramid in Giza [today known as cheops[?] pyramid] at a scale "three times reduced" [p.130], or, 146.67 meters h [440.01/3], or, 481.201206084513955 feet in height.

base [p], where p= perimeter [4*s]/2*h [s=side length, h=height] = exact-π, *or*, base length [s] = [π*h]/2 = 230.38869725100747 m. i chose this for a reason that i believe exact π is relevant, and was known to predynastic egyptian scientists... The scale of atlantis pyramid, I inferred from TP; atlantis pyramid = 2/3rds savanasa pyramid height; [440.01 *2 ] / 3 = 293.34 m, [less than 1/7th depth of ridge]; this suboceanic pyramid discovered, should then have a height of 962.401382322873142 feet [international foot to meter-to-foot conversion [1,000 ft = 304.80006096 m]. Its base length, comes out to 460.777394502014939 m, or 1,511.736556255099966 feet. [theta angle, beta, apothem etc, phi, e, other constants can be found in many other internet theories; for this one, only pi was used, to see what I could find...eventually realized that its so complex probably many constants are involved, after i examined *internal* dimensions as well, as their piezoelectric properties of the different stones. the significance of angle/slope still makes me scratch my head though];

anyway, if the measurement that this submerged açorean pyramid's base is about 8,000 square meters [take sq. root to get side length = 89.44271909999159 m], and the height is 60 meters; its obvious first, that these values are smaller than those of cheops pyramid. The book did not indicate it was damaged in any major structural way [then again did not specify much; however michel's 1997 lecture stated it is "under the ocean"; to some this suggests it is intact, and though speculative I feel this way also]. savanasa pyramid, though, was described to have been completely overturned and 'dropped' into the chasm formed during the cataclysm/deluge.

i found [well, googled] some 'on-land' açores "pyramid" photos, here http://www.joanocean.com/azore05/pyramid.jpg and here http://portuguese-american-journal.com/ ... s-00cf.jpg [also not the ones were looking for]. Yet the suboceanic pyramids "base bigger than football stadium"??? http://beforeitsnews.com/beyond-science ... 43658.html [football field length : 100 yards = 91.44 m]. how much bigger? [or maybe i think only of american football and not 'soccer' football : ) ]
User avatar
Rezo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:28 am
Location: usa

Re: Pyramid found under the water in the Azores

Post: # 13132Post Rezo »

"CPS digital technology" Currently Im attempting to learn what are image resolution limits of such method. first cps stands in this case for what? So far i haven't found any further details. Recalling when the sphinx and osirion were first found they were mostly buried in sand, barely visible [eroded from water, *wind* and sand: http://www.scientificcomputing.com/news ... x-revealed ], the same is probably the case for atlantis pyramid [water erosion]; but still, would expect imaging to reveal taller structure; hence my suspicion it may be in another place, perhaps nearby.

We 'know' savanasa pyramid was quarried, probably from holaton [easter island] [p.91] [originally this quarry was ten-times the size of now-remaining quarry [p.95]; and, that roads converged at savanasa [prediluvean interstate highway system; p.91], and, that egyptian megalithic stones [granite @ king chamber, slightly radioactive], in some cases were quarried at least hundreds of miles away. we also have heard of google maps excuse of lines, dismissed as mere 'ship tracks' which, could be much like those roads... i wonder if a map overlay between dr silvas find and these tracks, would reveal anything further. . . maybe yes maybe no. :-k http://www.human-resonance.org/submerged.html

alex uses the golden spiral but also shares the belief atlantis and lemuria fell due to 'classism' and 'materialism' which, maybe im misunderstanding but i dont quite agree with, [rather, that these negative societal traits, followed the destruction]. all we should do now though, for those interested that is, is to see if more evidence of such structure can be found, or such efforts supported. Im sorry to keep editing, i realize things as i write and its very detail oriented stuff. a habit i must strive to break from...this subject is mega complicated.
Post Reply