You'll notice that I'm being as sceptical as I can be here. Believing is not enough... you need to Know.
bomohwkl wrote:It is a process to discover the truthfulness of the book.
Surely you would not want to engage in this process for every one of the hundreds of abduction stories there are. So what would make you begin this process for TP?
Of course, the reasons are mostly hints. So that you have chances to really think and understand it.
'Hints?'. 'Hints' could be used in a book deceptively, to subconsciously make you think it 'feels' true. But what kind of hints do you mean for TP, can you give one example?
I think in Tom site there are several evidence such as tree plants and the Jesus burial in Japan,
These were known before the book was written. They cannot count as evidence.
Kirlian image on conscious study and the Thiaooubians bioresonant where the effect can be quantified by GVD.
Yes, this would be good evidence, but Tom doesn't seem to want to show or discuss how many trials with the t-shirts showed an effect with the GDV cameras. On the bioresonant sites there seems to be only 1 or 2 cases. Like any kind of scientific study, you need to show that the results are repeatable. It is important to clearly show that any effect felt by people who wear it is not either from a placebo effect, or from a mood elevation from looking at the shirts.
Verification of the presence of higher-self, the advantage of meditate and concentration on accessing the higher-self.
This is not evidence because these theories about the higher-selves and stories of these experiences are well-known and well-documented by many different traditions and religions.
MATERIAL evidence. They need material evidence. There is a reason why thiaooubians don't want to give any material evidence. Have you found it yet?
Perhaps my question wasn't clear here, perhaps I should have asked: Why SHOULD scientists on ANY planet be moved to investigate a book like this? Surely we WOULD want scientists to investigate the book and incorporate it into our knowledge. Why should they? With the word 'should' in there, perhaps the original paragraph explaining the question will make more sense to you now.
Can you explain to someone who is Meedan in a few sentences? We would have only a vague idea of who is Meedan. It is a good start as long as we strike to understand who is Meedan more from physically psychological, emotional and intellectual levels. The words spoken by people reveal a lot of information about the people. The more you INTERACT with a person from various levels , the more you UNDERSTAND the person.
Ok, I just feel that they could have included a little more information, on such an important topic. As for Meedan, he is at least a mind, with a little bit of intelligence - I hope. Don't strive to meet Meedan unless you are convinced he exists, of course. Otherwise you'd also have to strive to meet Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy also. In the great "Does Meedan Exist?" debate, I can tell you one of the most important questions, how Meedan came into existence, and you'll find it logical. I wouldn't ignore the controversy and ask you to expect you not to be sceptical. I will not claim that Meedan is something that he cannot possibly be.