coal soot causing temperature shift known since previous century!
http://www.independent.co.uk/environmen ... 95396.html
we can't 'sit by' while solutions provided are potentially worse then their problems...
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/20 ... ate-change
tracking accountability for SF6/NF3 emissions, true scope [and irony]:
http://my.firedoglake.com/normanb/tag/solar-panels/ [most detailed account I could find on the matter, few years old].
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer- ... 54717.html [german company 'Eon' and few others, produce thin film panels without harmful GWP].
"new" forms of energy are not new. they have long since existed, but are kept suppressed. solar and wind can only do so much, and due to conventional switch-gear electronics production processess that produce high-GWP chemicals, supporting such methods regardless of our ignorance of it, supports it. If you use solar, thats fine, just demand from these companies to develop cleaner technology, JUST as we do for coal, oil, and gas production methods...ironically THOSE cleaner methods 'clean coal', 'hydraulic fracturing of shale to produce natural gas', tar sands, etc. are often times not clean at all. . . dont get fooled.
As Tom has often mentioned, its what is happening inside the earth, that matters. any natural surface cooling that is inhibited contributes to harming the center. So, even technology that can help do controlled release of this heat, may also help. [rather than unmarked planes spraying the sky with OTHER pollution]...
Monitoring Natural Disasters and Pollution Levels
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Monitoring Natural Disasters and Pollution Levels
a paper from a company that evaluates Sulfur Hexafluoride gas and its contribution greenhouse effect through switchgear production and use: [dated - 2002]
http://www.tdeurope.eu/data/file/Enviro ... F6-Gas.pdf
note while reading [greenhouse effect relevant portion of article located on page 7], to consider GWP of SF6 and NF3s, as well as, ask the question, how much *would* be harmful? Their result is 0.1% total release. [1 out of 1000]
http://www.tdeurope.eu/data/file/Enviro ... F6-Gas.pdf
note while reading [greenhouse effect relevant portion of article located on page 7], to consider GWP of SF6 and NF3s, as well as, ask the question, how much *would* be harmful? Their result is 0.1% total release. [1 out of 1000]
Re: Monitoring Natural Disasters and Pollution Levels
Latest IPCC-report:
http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/#.UlGDsBBvCDE
THE IPCC FIFTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis
Later to be released:
*Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
*Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change
*Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report
http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/#.UlGDsBBvCDE
THE IPCC FIFTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis
Later to be released:
*Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
*Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change
*Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report
Re: Monitoring Natural Disasters and Pollution Levels
Thank you Rasmus, I see now that the scientific debate over global warming is over we maybe should move on to start an online "Demand Hydrogen" campaign? We will need pages on all social networks, multimedia content developers, bloggers and those willing to do e-journalism. We can increase our audience, by networking with people and concerned institutions, even use polls and petitions to learn and guide the aspirations of the campaign, and if successful a proper movement.
The essence of Consciousness, is the ability to Create, Process, Transmit and Receive Information Autonomously.
Re: Monitoring Natural Disasters and Pollution Levels
The essence of Consciousness, is the ability to Create, Process, Transmit and Receive Information Autonomously.