There are a lot of good web-sites about tiahuanaco and show us many things that confirm the michel´s book...but why can´t the storians and scientifics accept that tiahuanaco was built 15000 b.c ? they know the city was a port... but they think was "a port for titicaka lake" even though the port point at pacific ocean not to titikaka lake ,there are sea fossils in the city too etc... In a web site I read that the natives told the huge monolithics walked by themselves. (maybe an antigravitational force from the colonists) and that explains how they moved the 50 ton monolithics so far etc. a carved figure in the gateway of the sun of a mamut who live 10000 b. c confirms the antiquity etc...its stone buildings so precise cut that a knife can´t fit between 2 stones... The James Churchward´s series of mu tell about the city too like an amazing place!!
I don´t find the web-sites I read 4 years ago but these are good web sites about it
http://cristalweb.com/ethno/articles/14_en.php3
http://www.crystalinks.com/tiahuanaco.html
look around on the web about it , It is very interesting
Tiahuanaco is an amazing place!!!
Moderator: Moderators
Tiahuanaco is an amazing place!!!
I am sorry for my English is not my native tongue